Logo English
International Ukrainian Economic Association
Mizhnarodna Ukrainska Ekonomichna Asotsiatsia
Logo Ukrainian  


Return to IUEA Homepage

UKRAINIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW

  • Vol.I, (no. 1-2) 1995
  • Vol.II, (no. 3) 1996
  • Vol.III, (no. 4-5) 1998
  • CALL FOR PAPERS 2000!

    Subscribe to UER

    Editorial and Publishing Info

    To our Readers & Contributors

    Become a member of IUEA

    Congress 2000

  • UKRAINIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW

    Volume I, No. 1-2, 1995

    EXTERNAL SHOCKS AND PERFORMANCE RESPONSES DURING SYSTEMIC TRANSITION

    The Case of Ukraine

    F. Desmond McCarthy
    Chandra Pant
    Kangbin Zheng
    Giovanni Zanalda

    The World Bank
    Washington, D.C. 20433

    Abstract

    Ukraine encountered many economic problems in its first years of independence. Most serious among external shocks were the collapse of trade with the former Soviet Union and sharp price increases for energy imports. External shocks resulted in an income loss in the current accounts equivalent to about 14 percent of GDP a year in 1992 and 1993.

    Ukraine did not adopt an appropriate strategy for dealing with the impact of these shocks. Its main policy response has been to continue borrowing, increase arrears, postpone adjustments, and restore administrative interventions. Note only has this policy flight and rapid expansion of the underground economy.

    With the limited information available, McCarthy, Pant, Zheng, and Zanalda try to identify the major sources of external shocks and to estimate their impact on the current account. They also evaluate Ukraine's policy response.

    Based on examination of the experience of other countries in addressing adverse shocks, the authors recommend the following policies:

  • Full commitment to systemic reform and macroeconomic stabilization.
  • Privatization, price liberalization, development of a competitive market system, and reform of the legal system.

    For the particular situation of Ukraine, they emphasize the importance of:

  • Greater economic (especially energy) efficiency.
  • Integration into world systems of trade and finance.
  • Prudent borrowing and debt management strategies, as well as policies to encourage private foreign direct investment and to make more efficient use of foreign debt.

  • |
    Top of page |

    Questions & Comments regarding the IUEA & UER should be addressed to Professor I. S. Koropeckyj

    BRAMA Home -- UkraiNEWStand -- Community Press -- Calendar
    Advertise on BRAMA -- Search BRAMA
    Copyright © 1997-2011 BRAMA, Inc.tm, Inc. All Rights Reserved.