ADVERTISEMENT
New exhibition coming end April www.ukrainianmuseum.org
Posted by Petunia on August 27, 2005 at 11:47:09:
In Reply to: Re: dude, what was her name? posted by She did it to herself on August 27, 2005 at 11:21:01:
You have written the following in regards to her -
"All her evil actions"
"Honorable poor people don't do what she did" "Her intentions and actions were evil right from the beginning."
what I would like to understand is how you make the leap from the following to the above -
"quest for green card and material luxury"
"lie to her husband and to commit adultery"
am I correct in understanding that you justify killing someone if they commit adultery, lie to the husband and marry them for a green card and material luxury?
because forgive me, I just don't see her intentions and actions as "evil" and deserving of her fate. it is not even an "eye for an eye" situation as she killed no one and in fact her husband was not even aware that he was being cuckholded. I reserve using the word evil for people who I perceive as truly evil - who engage in criminal activity and commit acts of unspeakable inhumanity - pedophiles, serial killers, murderers, etc. Perhaps your definition is different. According to some religions esp. in the Judeo Christian line - her actions would be considered evil but does not it also not say vengeance is mine sayeth the Lord or do you see Cullen's actions as having been the instrument of divine retribution?