
Posted by Joe on July 16, 2000 at 16:06:14:
In Reply to: Re: áßÅÐÞÉÕ ÿÅÁÞßÐÍÎÍÊÝ. posted by Yanko on July 14, 2000 at 01:15:20:
To YANKO FROM JOE
RE: Yanko, your argument regarding Sevastopol deserves Pavel Miliukov's famous rhetorical questions “ Is this stupidity or is this treason?”
Yanko: Sorry, Joe, I do not find commies as interesting a topic as you apparently do. You will have
RE: Hm, Pavel Miliukov is communist. Well, if I claim that Yuschenko is communist equal to comrade Shelest or comrade Shterbickij wouldn't it be at least ridiculous, if not totally stupid?
RE: You should speak for yourself, namely for Yanko z Velykoho Bereznoho, but not “ my v zakarpatti”. Don't you think that it is a little bit arrogant?
Yanko: No, I do not think that knowing how people in different parts of Transcarpathia speak is arrogant.
RE: The arrogance is assigned to your claim “MY V ZAKARPATTI” and not to your knowledge how people speak in different parts of Subcarpathian Rus.
Yanko: But then again, your logic is the next greatest mystery after that of the value of the Cosmological Constant.
RE: The second part of my statement which you omitted was as follows: “Keep in mind you represent one vote and that’s it. If you have been elected into public office than, of course, you have right to speak “my v zakarpatti” but than you have to say so.” What about your logic, Yanko?
RE: How they could? Mukachevo has over 1100 years history and "Zaporozhec za Dunajom" with his “highly civilized manners” came only very recently. More importantly, he has to face the retreat, back where he came from.
Yanko: Sure! Cuz Joe said so. One with no less than zero votes.
RE: Not at all! I am completely irrelevant and you, with one vote, are less relevant than the commies were. Yanko, it’s the law of economy says so. Using the phrase from this administration, the answer is far more straightforward: “It’s the economy, stupid.” Period.