Posted by Yanko on June 29, 2000 at 18:53:30:
In Reply to: Re: More on Joe's and Yanko's peculiarities of mind posted by Joe on June 29, 2000 at 13:39:22:
: RE:"... VAGUE ASSOCIATIONS?
Very vague, Joe.
How can one classify the hearsay about Hitler's origin of blood stated by YOU (see the sentence above)?
Why I are you asking how one can classify those words, if I already answered that question. If you paid attention to the meaning of what I write instead of just looking for particular words that you can attack, you would notice that I put this phrase in the same category as your blaming me for the fact that Lysenko was Ukrainian. Both statements are nazi in essence, but you did not notice this in what you wrote, so I put it in the form that would be easier for you to recognize. It worked in the sence that you recognized nazism. However, your understanding of English is so poor, that you failed to understand, that my statement was not "ONE SHOULD BLAME JEWS FOR HITLER", but "WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS EQUIVALENT TO SAYING THAT ONE SHOULD BLAME JEWS FOR HITLER". Or, maybe, you just don't realize that nazism is a broader concept than just antisemitism. Then I must clarify: ANTIUKRAINISM IS PRECISELY AS BAD AS ANTISEMITISM, Joe.
How can one classify Taras' slogan presented on this board?
This question you should direct to Taras, not to me. Well, I know by now that it seems entirely logical to you that I should answer for what Taras writes. This is what I put into the euphemism of "vague associations", although I could use stronger words.
Yanko