[From nobody Tue Nov 10 12:22:15 2009 Return-path: <owner-h-earlyslavic@H-NET.MSU.EDU> Received: from ms4.ucs.fsu.edu ([146.201.3.234]) by v490.ucs.fsu.edu (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-7.05 (built Sep 5 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KSW00C85KCDOU90@v490.ucs.fsu.edu> for rromanch@MAILER.FSU.EDU; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:55:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from mdlv1.h-net.msu.edu (roy.matrix.msu.edu [35.9.18.49]) by ms4.ucs.fsu.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAAGtOgN009292 for <rromanch@MAILER.FSU.EDU>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:55:25 -0500 Received: from h-net.msu.edu (h-net.msu.edu [35.9.18.7]) by mdlv1.h-net.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FD7860A; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:55:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by H-NET.MSU.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 15.5) with spool id 3341138 for H-EARLYSLAVIC@H-NET.MSU.EDU; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:55:23 -0500 Received: from vscane-c.ucl.ac.uk (vscane-c.ucl.ac.uk [144.82.108.43]) by h-net.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF4C7DD3FE for <H-EARLYSLAVIC@H-NET.MSU.EDU>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:51:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from cs183241.pp.htv.fi ([213.243.183.241] helo=sergeiPC) by vscane-c.ucl.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <s.bogatyrev@ssees.ucl.ac.uk>) id 1N7tvr-0002sI-EU for H-EARLYSLAVIC@H-NET.MSU.EDU; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:51:03 +0000 Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:51:02 +0000 From: Sergei Bogatyrev <s.bogatyrev@SSEES.UCL.AC.UK> Subject: papers available on line for AAASS Igor' Tale panel Sender: Early Slavic Studies <H-EARLYSLAVIC@H-NET.MSU.EDU> Approved-by: s.bogatyrev@SSEES.UCL.AC.UK Approved: s.bogatyrev@SSEES.UCL.AC.UK To: H-EARLYSLAVIC@H-NET.MSU.EDU Reply-to: Early Slavic Studies <H-EARLYSLAVIC@H-NET.MSU.EDU> Message-id: <C8ECA6AA4F5C4BF0974F6E5680D68557@sergeiPC> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: list Thread-index: AcpiGvMD7yMEzchHQ/etQlzMsEndAwACt66A X-UCL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the UCL Helpdesk, helpdesk@ucl.ac.uk for more information X-UCL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UCL-MailScanner-From: s.bogatyrev@ssees.ucl.ac.uk X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5,1.2.40,4.0.166 definitions=2009-11-10_07:2009-10-29, 2009-11-10, 2009-11-10 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-0911100163 List-Owner: <mailto:H-EARLYSLAVIC-request@H-NET.MSU.EDU> List-Subscribe: <mailto:H-EARLYSLAVIC-subscribe-request@H-NET.MSU.EDU> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:H-EARLYSLAVIC-unsubscribe-request@H-NET.MSU.EDU> List-Help: <mailto:LISTSERV@H-NET.MSU.EDU?body=INFO%20H-EARLYSLAVIC> Original-recipient: rfc822;rromanch@MAILER.FSU.EDU X-Spam-Status: No From: Birnbaum, David J [mailto:djbpitt@pitt.edu]=20 Sent: 10 November 2009 15:32 To: H-EARLYSLAVIC@H-NET.MSU.EDU Subject: {SPAM?} papers available on line for AAASS Igor' Tale panel Dear Colleagues, The papers for the following panel have been published on line at http://clover.slavic.pitt.edu/~djb/2009_aaass/igor.html=20 so that those who are interested can read them before attending the = panel. Sincerely, David __ What Textual Criticism and Linguistic Analysis Tell Us about the Origin = of the Igor' Tale Session 14-30 (Roundtable) Northeastern Room, Sunday, 2009-11-15, 10:00 A.M.-11:45 A.M. Chair: David J. Birnbaum, University of Pittsburgh Panel abstract: Opinions about the dating of the Igor' Tale tend to = reflect the professional specializations of their proponents, which often = results in conversations that run at cross-purposes. In particular, while recent textual criticism supports the priority of the Zadon=B9cina (e.g., = Zimin) or the Igor' Tale's contemporaneity with that fifteenth-century text (e.g., Bobrov, =A9ibaev), recent linguistic argumentation (e.g., Zaliznjak, = Strakhov) supports the twelfth-century origin of the Igor' Tale. This panel = presents fresh overviews and reappraisals of the textological and linguistic arguments in light of recent scholarship. Our goal is, of course, not to resolve these perplexities (which are likely not resolvable), but to = draw attention to them and provide them with some context. ]