[aaus-list] FW: Window on Eurasia: Kyiv Disputes Moscow's Claim Few
Ukrainians in Russia Want Native Language Schools
Vera Andrushkiw
vandrushkiw at usukraine.org
Mon May 4 20:03:33 EDT 2009
>
>
>Window on Eurasia: Kyiv Disputes Moscows Claim Few Ukrainians in Russia
>Want Native Language Schools
>
>
>
>Paul Goble
>
>
>
> Vienna, May 4 Moscows assertion that ethnic Ukrainians in
> the Russian Federation, that countrys second largest nationality, do not
> have any problems with education in their own national language because
> they are not asking for it does not correspond to reality, according to
> a spokesman for the Ukrainian foreign ministry.
>
> A week ago, Andrey Nesterenko, a spokesman for the foreign
> ministry, said, in responding to an OSCE report, acknowledged that there
> were few Ukrainian language schools but said that reflected an absence of
> demand by Ukrainians for them rather than a Moscow policy against such
> schools
> (<http://rus.newsru.ua/ukraine/27apr2009/ukrschool.html>rus.newsru.ua/ukraine/27apr2009/ukrschool.html).
>
> The lack of such demands, the Russian diplomat continued,
> reflects what he described as the closeness of the Eastern Slavic
> languages and cultures, the common history (Kievan Rus, the Moscow State,
> the Russian Empire and the USSR) and the common Christian faith of the
> Russians and Ukrainians.
>
> Not surprisingly, Ukrainians and Ukrainian officials were
> outraged not only because Moscow has always insisted on the provision of
> Russian-language schools in Ukraine and complained when any of them are
> closed but also because Nesterenkos claim about the situation in
> Russia where in fact Ukrainians would like Ukrainian language schools
> does not correspond to the facts
> (<http://www.vz.ru/news/4/30/282440.html>www.vz.ru/news/4/30/282440.html).
>
> Indeed, Ukrainian commentators have pointed out, Ukraine does
> support Russian language education in its schools and that last year, the
> OSCE commissar on national minorities declared after examining the
> situation there that he did not find any violation of the rights of the
> Russian language population in Ukraine
> (<http://rus.newsru.ua/ukraine/27mar2008/mova.html>rus.newsru.ua/ukraine/27mar2008/mova.html).
>
>
> Vasily Kirilich, a spokesman for the Ukrainian foreign
> ministry, said that Nesterenkos statement was intended to mislead the
> OSCE by creating the false impression of the supposedly problem-free
> nature of Ukrainian national cultural development in Russia, a
> particular travesty because ethnic Ukrainians at 2.5 million are the
> second largest national minority there.
>
> He pointed out that in Moscow alone, there are now more than
> 250,000 ethnic Ukrainians but not a single middle school with instruction
> in the Ukrainian language, something that creates problems both for the
> indigenous Ukrainian population of the city and the many other Ukrainians
> who work temporarily there and plan to return to Ukraine.
>
> Elsewhere in the Russian Federation, throughout which ethnic
> Ukrainians are to be found, the situation is even worse, he said. At
> present there is no school anywhere in the Russian Federation where the
> entire academic program is conducted in the Ukrainian language. There
> exists only [a few] schools with an ethno-national (ethno-cultural) component.
>
> The Ukrainian diplomat was clearly infuriated by the
> suggestion that Ukrainians living in the Russian Federation were not
> interested in preserving their own language through the schools and that,
> to use Nesterenkos words, citizens of the Russian Federation of
> Ukrainian nationality and Russians among citizens of Ukraine are in a
> different ethno-cultural situation.
>
> Russian commentaries in support of Moscows point of view,
> such as Aleksandr Karavayev today, have suggested that the Ukrainians
> have only themselves to blame. Moscow has routinely supported
> Russian-language efforts in Ukraine, but Kyiv has been largely inactive
> in supporting Ukrainian-programs in Ukraine
> (<http://www.ia-centr.ru/expert/4599/>www.ia-centr.ru/expert/4599/).
>
> While there is some truth in what Karavayev says, that claim
> ignores two longer-standing if unfortunate realities. On the one hand,
> in Soviet times, Moscow provided Russian-language schools in all
> republics but did not provide any schools for non-Russians in their
> language outside their titular territories.
>
> Thus, while Ukrainians living in Ukraine did have schools in
> Ukrainian, those Ukrainians living elsewhere did not, unlike Russians who
> in almost all cases had Russian-language schools wherever they
> lived. The current situation is a survival of that past, one Ukrainians
> and many other non-Russians decry.
>
> And on the other, this pattern reflects an even older view,
> long propounded by Russians and accepted by many Western specialists.
> According to that view, Ukrainians and Belarusians are byproducts of
> Russian ethno-national development, and thus it is entirely appropriate
> that they be integrated linguistically and politically with the Russian
> nation and state.
>
> In fact, as the Ukrainians and Belarusians know and, as
> statements like that of Kirilich last week show, are increasingly
> prepared to defend, those two nations have a separate and distinct
> ethno-national and political history, one that deserves equal treatment
> and respect not only from the Russians but from all members of the
> international community as well.
>
>
>
>
>
>
Vera Andrushkiw
Vice President for External Relations
U.S.-Ukraine Foundation
1701 K Street, N.W. Suite 903
Washington, DC 20006
Phone: (202) 223-2228 x 13
Fax: (202) 223-1224
E-mail: vandrushkiw at usukraine.org
On the Internet: www.usukraine.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.brama.com/pipermail/aaus-list/attachments/20090504/53dcad8a/attachment.html
More information about the aaus-list
mailing list